跳到主要內容

發表文章

目前顯示的是 3月, 2007的文章

微軟咖啡機相關報導

http://article.pchome.net/140922.html http://info.china.alibaba.com/news/detail/v5000441-d5976713.html http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2002/nov02/11-17SPOT.mspx http://www.msndirect.com/ 思考一下jabber能做什麼? 或許比想像中的更多

順手寫了blog ping的服務

Blog Ping 服務(beta) ,目前會通知這些網站 http://blogsearch.google.com/ping/RPC2 http://rpc.icerocket.com:10080 http://api.moreover.com/ping http://api.moreover.com/RPC2 http://api.my.yahoo.com/RPC2 http://bblog.com/ping.php http://blog.goo.ne.jp/XMLRPC http://bulkfeeds.net/rpc http://ping.bitacoras.com http://pinger.blogflux.com/rpc/ http://ping.feedburner.com/rpc/ping http://ping.myblog.jp http://rpc.pingomatic.com http://ping.syndic8.com/xmlrpc.php http://ping.weblogalot.com/rpc.php http://rpc.blogbuzzmachine.com/RPC2 http://rpc.blogrolling.com/pinger/ http://rpc.pingomatic.com http://rpc.tailrank.com/feedburner/RPC2 http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping http://rpc.weblogs.com/RPC2 http://services.newsgator.com/ngws/xmlrpcping.aspx http://www.blogdigger.com/RPC2 http://www.blogpeople.net/servlet/weblogUpdates

json相關文章

http://tagneto.org/how/reference/js/DynamicScriptRequest.html http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2005/12/the_ajax_resp on.html http://blog.yam.com/syshen/article/5910213 http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/web/wa-cachejson.html http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb299886.aspx http://json.org/json-zh.html http://www.developer.com/lang/jscript/article.php/3596836 http://caterpillar.onlyfun.net/Gossip/AjaxGossip/JSON.html http://next.writers.idv.tw/2006/12/json.html http://snippets.dzone.com/posts/show/749

Side effect 的意義

you are able to modify “global” variables from within a function. This is a side effect because the modification of this global variable is not related to the output produced by the function. Furthermore, modifying the state of the real world is considered a side effect: printing something to the screen, reading a file, etc., are all side effecting operations. Functions that do not have side effects are called pure. 由這個觀點看來haskell & erlang 都應是被稱為 pure functional language

恩! 第二次聽這個理論,似乎又更清楚了

lazy: 1. expressions which are not needed to determine the answer to a problem are not evaluated 這一點;下一週我應該更清楚的詢問 a.這跟recursion 有關嗎?事實上recursion 跟這個描述有點類似 b.沒有答案,要如何偵測結果的對錯,比如型態的問題,或是溢位的問題 在我看到 Yet Another Haskell Tutorial 第三章快結束時 我想通了 2. implementation of non-stictness ===================================================== 有時間該常上的網站(Lamdba the ultimate) http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/

套一句我父親常說的話

書是永遠讀不完滴,不懂的地方就是去學習囉! Lex & Yacc http://epaperpress.com/lexandyacc/ http://dinosaur.compilertools.net/ http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/linux/sdk/lex/ http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~compiler/yacc/ http://ds9a.nl/lex-yacc/cvs/lex-yacc-howto.html